Maybe the same thing happens with 16GB, when you need to work on say 20GB of files. This is especially slow because your storage is a slow, 5400-rpm hard drive (I think). So if your MBP originally had 8GB of data, but your graphics programs (including artwork) take up 10GB of data, then it will be swapping 2GB back and forth to accomplish your tasks. When your 2012 MBP fills its RAM, it swaps that data back and forth with your storage (pockets). What you can't fit in your hands, you put in your pockets, to manipulate at a later time, when you're done with the current batch of items in your hand. If your hands are smaller, the less you can fit in your hands, thus-the less you can manipulate at once. So think of it as the size of your hands: the bigger your hands, the more you can fit in your hands, the more you can manipulate with your hands. Quick analogy but long explanation about RAM-RAM is what the computer puts in memory, and what is in memory it can manipulate. I too am a graphic designer that works from home, and my main apps are also InDesign & Illustrator (occasionally work in audio and video). My main focus is being able to use my Adobe Programs with ease and not have to wait a million years for a large file to save. In my case, I’m not sure if i7 or i9 really makes a difference for me and I’m not too concerned about the graphics card since I don’t play many games on the computer.
#BEST GRAPHIC DESIGN SOFTWARE FOR MAC 2012 PRO#
I’m not sure if this has anything to do with the age of my MacBook Pro or if 16GB just simply isn’t enough and I should just spend the extra $400 on a 32GB model? There was a slight difference, but applications were still quitting on me or I’d get a warning that I ran out of memory and my files can’t be opened. Also a fair amount of Photoshop.) At one point, I got frustrated and purchased 16GB of ram to put in my Macbook. (I mainly use Illustrator and InDesign for my job.
It’s done me very well over the years, but in the past two years I’ve noticed that quite often it would quit out of my Adobe programs. My current MacBook Pro is the 13” Mid-2012 MacBook Pro, originally 8gb RAM. If you just want to make an advertisement for your trainings - then tell us this and not show us (in my View) this list of nonsense.I am a graphic designer who does a lot of design work from home. of course output is not all what the GPU is for but it ist the most important thing for smooth modeling and on a old non retina display some slower GPUs are total fine for smaller and good structured Rhino Models. just the intern monitor of a notebook or on two 4K Screens. That what you tell about the graphics card also depends where you want to get out everything. A 21" Imac also is fast enough for many works with rhino (not Skyscrapers ).Īnd you tell every 15" MBP is okay - thats not true a 2006 MBP with a 1.8 dualcore and 2 or 4 GB Ram is a little bit to slow.īy the way my old 13" MBP with a dual core and 4GB RAM is for many Rhino works totally fine. In my university most students works with a 13" System and also the 2012 13" Macbooks are not so bad in Rhino for the most cases also Grashopper that is enough. In this Forum there many questions about the best hardware configuration for Rhino and for a new system you are a little bit far away from the reality.Ī 13" Macbook with 4 cores ist relly good in Rhino. I am a Produkt Designer and I doesn’t built skyscrapers with Rhino but complex Products. It totaly depends what you Rhino using for. I use a 15" MBP an it is totally good for my work on Rhino. Sorry for the hard answer but in my view it seems like a advertisement spam.Īlso that what you describe on the website looks a little bit like unexact nonsense for me.
0 kommentar(er)
